People v Joseph Johnson

Annotate this Case
People v Johnson 2005 NY Slip Op 09083 [23 AD3d 635] November 28, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 18, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Joseph Johnson, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), dated March 8, 2004, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The County Court's determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender in accordance with the risk assessment instrument was supported by clear and convincing evidence. Thus, it should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Baylor, 19 AD3d 467 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 710 [2005]; People v Masters, 19 AD3d 387 [2005]; People v Williams, 19 AD3d 388 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 713 [2005]; People v Villanueva, 13 AD3d 431 [2004]; People v Dong V. Dao, 9 AD3d 401, 401-402 [2004]; People v Hampton, 300 AD2d 641 [2002]). Schmidt, J.P., Cozier, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.