People v Nathaniel Grayton

Annotate this Case
People v Grayton 2005 NY Slip Op 07551 [22 AD3d 598] October 11, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Nathaniel Grayton, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), rendered February 6, 2003, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his constitutional right to be present at a material stage of the trial was not violated (see People v Morales, 80 NY2d 450, 455-457 [1992]; People v Babb, 226 AD2d 469, 470 [1996]; People v Chicas, 204 AD2d 476, 476-477 [1994]).

The Supreme Court properly admitted into evidence photographs depicting the shirt worn by the murder victim (see People v Pobliner, 32 NY2d 356, 369-370 [1973], cert denied 416 US 905 [1974]; People v Collic, 285 AD2d 514, 515 [2001]; People v DeBerry, 234 AD2d 470, 470-471 [1996]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not warrant reversal. Santucci, J.P., Luciano, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.