People v Joseph Jung

Annotate this Case
People v Jung 2005 NY Slip Op 07390 [22 AD3d 506] October 3, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 14, 2005

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Joseph Jung, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered August 11, 2003, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge concerning the Supreme Court's charge on the issue of justification is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant did not object to the charge as given or request a supplemental charge (see CPL 470.50 [2]; People v Moultrie, 6 AD3d 730 [2004]; People v Santos, 280 AD2d 561). Under the circumstances of this case, we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v Holmes, 12 AD3d 532 [2004]; cf. People v Feuer, 11 AD3d 633 [2004]). Adams, J.P., S. Miller, Ritter and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.