Matter of Rieco Properties, Inc. v Town of Hempstead

Annotate this Case
Matter of Rieco Props., Inc. v Town of Hempstead 2005 NY Slip Op 06036 [20 AD3d 541] July 18, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 21, 2005

In the Matter of Rieco Properties, Inc., Respondent,
v
Town of Hempstead et al., Appellants.

—[*1]In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, dated August 6, 2003, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner's application for a building permit, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), entered April 30, 2004, which granted the petition, annulled the determination, and directed that the building permit be granted with appropriate conditions.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner, Rieco Properties, Inc., commenced this proceeding to challenge a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Hempstead denying its application for a building permit for a construction and demolition debris processing facility. We affirm the Supreme Court's annulment of the determination, as it was arbitrary and capricious and not supported by substantial evidence in the record (see Matter of Charles A. Field Delivery Serv. [Roberts], 66 NY2d 516 [1985]; Matter of Civic Assn. of Setaukets v Trotta, 8 AD3d 482 [2004]). H. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.