Matter of Alexander Moore v Michael F. Mullen

Annotate this Case
Matter of Moore v Mullen 2005 NY Slip Op 01913 [16 AD3d 509] March 14, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 18, 2005

In the Matter of Alexander Moore et al., Petitioners,
v
Michael F. Mullen, Respondent. Thomas J. Spota, Nonparty Respondent.

—[*1]Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of a writ of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the trial of the actions entitled People v Moore, People v Prospect, and People v Myers, pending in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under Indictment Nos. 1010-04, 2153-04, and 2354-04, respectively.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioners have failed to demonstrate their clear legal right to the relief sought. Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.