Felix Feliciano v State of New York

Annotate this Case
Feliciano v State of New York 2005 NY Slip Op 01865 [16 AD3d 452] March 14, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 18, 2005

Felix Feliciano, Appellant,
v
State of New York, Respondent. (Claim No. 67055)

—[*1]In a proceeding pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) for leave to file a late claim, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Scuccimarra, J.), entered October 16, 2003, which denied the application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Court of Claims providently exercised its discretion in denying the claimant's application for leave to file a late claim (see Court of Claims Act § 10 [6]; Anderson v City Univ. of N.Y. at Queens Coll., 8 AD3d 413 [2004]; Quilliam v State of New York, 282 AD2d 590 [2001]; Edens v State of New York, 259 AD2d 729 [1999]; Qing Liu v City Univ. of N.Y., 262 AD2d 473 [1999]; Broncati v State of New York, 288 AD2d 172 [2001]; Matter of Gallagher v State of New York, 236 AD2d 400 [1997]). Florio, J.P., Schmidt, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.