Matter of Pinches Ostreicher v Florence Pollack

Annotate this Case
Matter of Ostreicher v Pollack 2005 NY Slip Op 01542 [15 AD3d 664] February 28, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 20, 2005

In the Matter of Pinches Ostreicher, Appellant,
v
Florence Pollack, Respondent.

—[*1]In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (C. Goldstein, R.), dated December 30, 2003, as vested in the mother the right to choose the school the parties' child would attend, and denied his request for an award of an attorney's fee.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that the mother should choose the school the subject child will attend, as this is in the best interest of the child (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167 [1982]; Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89 [1982]).

The father's remaining contentions are without merit. Luciano, J.P., Crane, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.