People v Dong V. Dao

Annotate this Case
People v Dong V. Dao 2004 NY Slip Op 06032 [9 AD3d 401] July 12, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 22, 2004

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Dong V. Dao, Appellant.

โ€”[*1]Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Brown, J.), dated July 18, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The County Court's designation of the defendant as a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law art 6-C; People v Smith, 5 AD3d 752 [2004], lv denied โ€” NY3d โ€” [June 29, 2004]; People v Moore, 1 AD3d 421 [2003], lv denied 2 NY3d 743 [2004]; People v Brooks, 308 AD2d 99 [2003]).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.