People v Salvador Gonzalez

Annotate this Case
People v Gonzalez 2004 NY Slip Op 05799 [9 AD3d 374] July 6, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 22, 2004

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Salvador Gonzalez, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), rendered November 1, 2001, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, criminal impersonation in the first degree, and possession of burglar tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the prosecutor's summation deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Malave, 7 AD3d 542 [May 3, 2004])

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review. Smith, J.P., Krausman, Crane and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.