Ismet Tatlici v APA Truck Leasing Corp.

Annotate this Case
Tatlici v APA Truck Leasing Corp. 2004 NY Slip Op 05642 [8 AD3d 656] June 28, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004

Ismet Tatlici et al., Appellants,
v
APA Truck Leasing Corp. et al., Respondents.

—[*1]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aliotta, J.), entered March 13, 2003, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against them.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly rejected the plaintiffs' request to charge the jury that the defendants were liable for any subsequent aggravation of the injuries due to subsequent medical treatment, or even subsequent medical malpractice (see PJI3d 2:305 [2004 Supp]), since there was no factual basis for such a charge (see LaGrasta v Ettayyim, 5 AD3d 737 [2004]; Lebron v St. Vincent's Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 261 AD2d 246 [1999]). S. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.