People v Alfredo Ramirez

Annotate this Case
People v Ramirez 2004 NY Slip Op 05475 [8 AD3d 1134] Decided on June 21, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 21, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARMENT
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
SANDRA L. TOWNES
STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ. DECISION & ORDER
2002-03212
2002-03213

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Alfredo Ramirez, appellant. (Ind. No. 1365/00, 320/02)




Judah Maltz, Kew Gardens, N.Y., for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John
M. Castellano and Sharon Y. Brodt of
counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the brief),
for respondent.

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), both imposed March 20, 2002, on the ground that the sentences are excessive.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed. No opinion.
PRUDENTI, P.J., ALTMAN, LUCIANO, TOWNES and CRANE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.