People v Kareem Battle

Annotate this Case
People v Battle 2004 NY Slip Op 05463 [8 AD3d 1133] Decided on June 21, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 21, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARMENT
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
DAVID S. RITTER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT
BARRY A. COZIER, JJ. DECISION & ORDER
2003-08319

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Kareem Battle, appellant. (Ind. No. 9407/00)




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Diane R.
Eisner of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), imposed September 18, 2003, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed. No opinion.
PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, GOLDSTEIN, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.