Royal Caterers v Marine Midland

Annotate this Case
Royal Caterers, LLC v Marine Midland 2004 NY Slip Op 05432 [8 AD3d 549] June 21, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004

Royal Caterers, LLC, et al., Appellants,
v
Marine Midland et al., Respondents.

—[*1]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated July 29, 2002, which granted the motion of the defendant Leonard Weiner, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the complaint for failing to comply with court-ordered discovery.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs' repeated failure to comply with court-ordered discovery and their failure to timely pay monetary sanctions imposed was clearly willful, deliberate, and contumacious conduct. Thus, the Supreme Court, providently exercised its discretion in dismissing their complaint (see Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 120-123 [1999]; Russell v B&B Indus., 309 AD2d 914 [2003]; Vanalst v City of New York, 302 AD2d 515 [2003]). Florio, J.P., Luciano, Townes and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.