Blair Carney v General Growth Management

Annotate this Case
Carney v General Growth Mgt., Inc. 2004 NY Slip Op 05403 [8 AD3d 522] June 21, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004

Blair Carney, Respondent,
v
General Growth Management, Inc., Defendant, and Positive Productions, Inc., Appellant.

—[*1]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Positive Productions, Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), entered July 14, 2003, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it was properly denied as untimely since it made the motion approximately seven months after the note of issue was filed and failed to demonstrate good cause for the delay in making the motion (see CPLR 3212 [a]; Gomez v Kukaj, 290 AD2d 531 [2002]).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the appellant's remaining contention. Florio, J.P., Luciano, Townes and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.