Rosemary Roldan v Seaman Furniture Company

Annotate this Case
Roldan v Seaman Furniture Co., Inc. 2004 NY Slip Op 05225 [8 AD3d 463] June 14, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004

Rosemary Roldan, Appellant,
v
Seaman Furniture Company, Inc., Respondent.

—[*1]In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated July 7, 2003, as, upon renewal, adhered to its original determination in an order dated March 12, 2003, granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Upon renewal, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its original determination granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837 [1986]). Smith, J.P., S. Miller, Adams, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.