Dora Ivery v Oceanview II Associates

Annotate this Case
Ivery v Oceanview II Assoc. 2004 NY Slip Op 05202 [8 AD3d 440] June 14, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004

Dora Ivery, Respondent,
v
Oceanview II Associates, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

—[*1]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated July 29, 2003, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant, Oceanview II Associates (hereinafter Oceanview), as landlord of the subject building, had a duty to take minimal security precautions against reasonably foreseeable criminal acts by third parties (see James v Jamie Towers Hous. Co., 99 NY2d 639, 641 [2003]). There are issues of fact, inter alia, as to whether the presence of Chester Jones on the premises was a foreseeable risk which Oceanview was obligated to take precautions against (see Mason v U.E.S.S. Leasing Corp., 96 NY2d 875, 877 [2001]). In view of the foregoing, Oceanview failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Krausman, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.