Hunter Highlands I Condominium v Yolo Equities Corp.

Annotate this Case
Hunter Highlands I Condominium v Yolo Equities Corp. 2004 NY Slip Op 05199 [8 AD3d 437] June 14, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004

Hunter Highlands I Condominium, Appellant,
v
Yolo Equities Corp., Respondent.

—[*1]

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), entered March 4, 2003, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, it was only an incidental beneficiary under the agreement at issue (see State of Cal. Pub. Employees' Retirement Sys. v Shearman & Sterling, 95 NY2d 427 [2000]; Fourth Ocean Putnam Corp. v Interstate Wrecking Co., 66 NY2d 38 [1985]). Therefore, it could not maintain a third-party beneficiary claim against the defendant under the agreement (see State of Cal. Pub. Employees' Retirement Sys. v Shearman & Sterling, supra; Fenton v Fenton, 253 AD2d 844 [1998]).

The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit. Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Schmidt and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.