Elul Realty Corp. v Herbert Glabman
Annotate this CaseElul Realty Corp., Appellant,
v
Herbert Glabman et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Noel W. Hauser, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
—[*1]In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated June 11, 2001, which denied a motion which was, in effect, for leave to reargue a prior motion to dismiss the matter based upon its default in discovery.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly treated the motion as one for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (see SantaMaria v Schwartz, 238 AD2d 569 [1997]). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.