Matter of Gordon R. Skinner v Michael F. Amodio

Annotate this Case
Matter of Skinner v Amodio 2004 NY Slip Op 04734 [8 AD3d 395] June 7, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004

In the Matter of Gordon R. Skinner, Appellant,
v
Michael F. Amodio et al., Respondents.

—[*1]In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents dated June 12, 2002, which denied the petitioner benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-a, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Zambelli, J.), dated April 3, 2003, which denied the petition, granted the respondents' motion to dismiss the proceeding, and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The challenged determination was not arbitrary or capricious (see CPLR 7803 [3]; Matter of Cole-Hatchard v Sherwood, 309 AD2d 933 [2003]).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.