Matter of Jean-Joseph Roman v Tamar Roman

Matter of Roman v Roman 2004 NY Slip Op 04732 [8 AD3d 394] June 7, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004

In the Matter of Jean-Joseph Roman, Appellant,
v
Tamar Roman, Respondent.

—[*1]In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Edlitz, J.), dated July 11, 2001, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Kava, H.E.), dated May 11, 2001, dismissing his petitions for modification of his child support obligation without prejudice.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father's contention, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that his petitions for modification of his child support obligation were premature.

To the extent that the father requests that this Court vacate or nullify a separate order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated May 4, 2000, we lack jurisdiction to review such order as the father did not appeal from it (see Palumbo v Palumbo, 298 AD2d 373 [2002]).

The father's remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Adams, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.