Matter of Deborah Mahoney v Peter Hefter

Annotate this Case
Matter of Mahoney v Hefter 2004 NY Slip Op 04723 [8 AD3d 388] June 7, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004

In the Matter of Deborah Mahoney, Appellant,
v
Peter Hefter, Respondent.

—[*1]In a custody and visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Brennan, J.), dated April 9, 2002, as, in effect, denied her application for an award of an attorney's fee.

Ordered that order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The mother was not a "prevailing party" within the meaning of the parties' stipulation of settlement. Thus, the Family Court properly, in effect, denied her application for an award of an attorney's fee. H. Miller, J.P., Adams, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.