Matter of Brunetta Clarke v Carson Clarke

Annotate this Case
Matter of Clarke v Clarke 2004 NY Slip Op 04710 [8 AD3d 375] June 7, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004

In the Matter of Brunetta Clarke, Appellant,
v
Carson Clarke, Respondent.

—[*1]In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Brunetta Clarke appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Weinstein, J.), dated November 30, 2001, which, after a hearing, dismissed her petition for an order of protection against Carson Clarke.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a dispositional hearing and the entry of an appropriate order of disposition.

Contrary to the Family Court's determination, the petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent committed acts constituting harassment in the second degree and disorderly conduct, warranting the issuance of an order of protection against him (see Family Ct Act § 812 [1]; § 832; Penal Law § 240.26 [1]; § 240.20 [1]; Matter of Pesce v Pesce, 223 AD2d 647 [1996]; Matter of Marsha C. v Latoya D., 224 AD2d 522 [1996]). Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Schmidt and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.