People v Jose Roman

Annotate this Case
People v Roman 2004 NY Slip Op 04365 [8 AD3d 1134] Decided on June 1, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 1, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARMENT
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
SANDRA L. TOWNES
STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ. DECISION & ORDER
2003-01012

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Jose Roman, appellant. (Ind. No. 6287/01)




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Jacqueline
M. Linares of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mangano, J.), imposed June 6, 2002, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion.
PRUDENTI, P.J., ALTMAN, LUCIANO, TOWNES and CRANE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.