Matter of Jacqueline A. Hoey-Kennedy v Thomas F. Kennedy

Annotate this Case
Matter of Hoey-Kennedy v Kennedy 2004 NY Slip Op 04336 [8 AD3d 279] June 1, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2004

In the Matter of Jacqueline A. Hoey-Kennedy, Appellant,
v
Thomas F. Kennedy, Respondent.

—[*1]In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Eisman, J.), dated September 30, 2002, which denied her objections to an order of the same court (Dwyer, H.E.), dated April 2, 2002, granting the father's petition, inter alia, for a modification of child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The father established a substantial change in circumstances warranting a downward modification of child support (see Weiss v Weiss, 294 AD2d 566 [2002]).

The mother's remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Cozier and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.