People v Daniel Willis

Annotate this Case
People v Willis 2004 NY Slip Op 01421 [5 AD3d 407] March 1, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 26, 2004

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Daniel Willis, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), rendered August 22, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and unlawful possession of marijuana, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the limited extent to which a prosecution witness was allowed to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination did not undermine the defendant's right of confrontation (see People v Chin, 67 NY2d 22 [1986]; People v Navarro, 251 AD2d 353 [1998]; People v Brock, 238 AD2d 347 [1997]; People v Rodriguez, 177 AD2d 664 [1991]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). S. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.