People v Terrence Platt

Annotate this Case
People v Platt 2004 NY Slip Op 01412 [5 AD3d 402] March 1, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 26, 2004

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Terrence Platt, Appellant.

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court, dated November 18, 2002 (People v Platt, 299 AD2d 496 [2002]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 15, 2000, on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Ordered that the appellant is granted leave to serve and file a brief on the issues of whether the court erred in discharging a juror over defense counsel's objection and in failing to give the appellant's counsel an opportunity to be heard in connection with notes sent by jurors for clarification of a charge; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the application: Mark Diamond, Esq., Murray Hill Station, P.O. Box 1805, New York, N.Y. 10016, and it is further,

Ordered that assigned counsel shall prosecute the application expeditiously in accordance with this Court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1 et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,

Ordered that the application is held in abeyance in the interim. Krausman, J.P., Goldstein, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.