People v Eduardo Innis

People v Innis 2004 NY Slip Op 00679 [4 AD3d 901] Decided on February 9, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 9, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARMENT
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
HOWARD MILLER
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ. DECISION & ORDER
2002-03568

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Eduardo Innis, appellant. (Ind. No. 11688/98)




Richard L. Herzfeld, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Sholom J. Twersky of
counsel; Robert W. Ho on the
memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), imposed March 27, 2002, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion.
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, KRAUSMAN, H. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk