Prudence German v Interfaith Medical Center
Annotate this CasePrudence German, Appellant,
v
Interfaith Medical Center, Respondent.
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated April 4, 2003, which denied her motion for summary judgment with leave to renew upon completion of discovery.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment because discovery, including the court-ordered deposition of the plaintiff, had not yet been completed (see CPLR 3212 [f]; Ryo v Minerva, 290 AD2d 434 [2002]; Sazer v Marino, 280 AD2d 537 [2001]; Hoxha v City of New York, 265 AD2d 379 [1999]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.