Harold Field v New York City Transit Authority

Annotate this Case
Field v New York City Tr. Auth. 2004 NY Slip Op 00634 [4 AD3d 389] February 9, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 21, 2004

Harold Field, Appellant,
v
New York City Transit Authority et al., Defendants. Linda L. George, Nonparty Respondent.

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated March 4, 2003, which, inter alia, granted that branch of the motion of his former attorney which was, in effect, for a share of the net attorney's fees to the extent of directing his present attorney to pay 25% of the net attorney's fees earned as a result of the settlement of the action to the former attorney.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondent.

The appellant is not aggrieved by the order (see CPLR 5511; Scopelliti v Town of New Castle, 92 NY2d 944, 945 [1998]). Thus, the appeal must be dismissed. To the extent that the brief filed purports to be on behalf of the plaintiff's present attorney, no notice of appeal was filed on his behalf (see Geoghegan v Peninsula Hosp. Ctr., 309 AD2d 834 [2003]). In any event, the order was entered upon the present attorney's default in answering the motion (see CPLR 5511). Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Townes, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.