People v Michael Mandrall

Annotate this Case
People v Mandrall 2004 NY Slip Op 00536 [4 AD3d 901] Decided on February 2, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 2, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARMENT
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
FRED T. SANTUCCI
NANCY E. SMITH
THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ. DECISION & ORDER
2002-04418

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Michael Mandrall, appellant. (Ind. No. 10339/00)




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Linda Breen of counsel;
Renee Anderson on the
memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), imposed April 8, 2002, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion.
PRUDENTI, P.J., SANTUCCI, SMITH and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.