DOF Holdings v Kevin Bove

Annotate this Case
DOF Holdings v Bove 2004 NY Slip Op 00487 [4 AD3d 323] February 2, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 21, 2004

DOF Holdings, LLC, Respondent,
v
Kevin Bove et al., Appellants.

—In an action to enforce a covenant not to compete contained in a purchase agreement dated November 9, 1998, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated November 19, 2002, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Therefore, their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied, regardless of the sufficiency of the plaintiff's opposing papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]).

The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Florio, S. Miller and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.