Matter of Save Monroe Ave., Inc. v Town of Brighton
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 17, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: BANNISTER, J.P., OGDEN, GREENWOOD, AND DELCONTE, JJ.
871 CA 22-01939
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF SAVE MONROE AVE., INC., 2900 MONROE AVE., LLC, CLIFFORDS OF PITTSFORD, L.P., ELEXCO LAND SERVICES, INC., JULIA D. KOPP, MARK BOYLAN, ANNE BOYLAN AND STEVEN M. DEPERRIOR, PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
TOWN OF BRIGHTON, TOWN BOARD OF TOWN OF BRIGHTON, TOWN OF BRIGHTON PLANNING BOARD, DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA, LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., M & F, LLC, THE DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES, RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS.
HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (CHARLES W. MALCOMB OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS TOWN OF BRIGHTON, TOWN BOARD OF TOWN OF BRIGHTON, AND TOWN OF BRIGHTON PLANNING BOARD.
WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (JOHN C. NUTTER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA, LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., M & F, LLC, AND THE DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered November 9, 2022, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and declaratory judgment action. The judgment dismissed the petition-complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: November 17, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.