Lampack v Andrews
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 17, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, MONTOUR, GREENWOOD, AND NOWAK, JJ.
845 CA 22-01409
[*1]STACY A. LAMPACK AND ROBERT LAMPACK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS,
v
RICHARD A. ANDREWS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.
RICHARD A. ANDREWS, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENTLEWIS COUNTY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (VICTOR L. PRIAL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.
HARDING MAZZOTTI, LLP, ALBANY (PETER P. BALOUSKAS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.
FITZGERALD MORRIS BAKER FIRTH, P.C., GLENS FALLS (JOSHUA D. LINDY OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Appeal and cross-appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Lewis County (James P. McClusky, J.), entered August 2, 2022. The order denied the motion of defendant-third-party plaintiff for summary judgment, granted in part and denied in part the motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment and denied the cross-motion of plaintiffs for partial summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: November 17, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.