Hamill v Hamill
Annotate this CaseDecided on July 28, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, OGDEN, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.
585 CA 23-00576
[*1]CHRISTOPHER HAMILL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
PHYLLIS HAMILL AND TRACEY DIEHL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
HAGERTY & BRADY, BUFFALO (DANIEL JOSEPH BRADY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
RUPP PFALZGRAF LLC, BUFFALO (JAMES GRABER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Dennis E. Ward, J.), entered November 29, 2022. The order, inter alia, denied a motion to dismiss the complaint and for sanctions.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Hamill v Hamill ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [July 28, 2023] [4th Dept 2023]).
Entered: July 28, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.