Matter of Tuttle v Worthington
Annotate this CaseDecided on August 11, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND OGDEN, JJ.
535 CAF 22-01011
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF KATRINA TUTTLE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v
KRISTINE WORTHINGTON, DONALD WORTHINGTON, ANDREW WORTHINGTON, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, AND ALLEGANY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. MICHAEL J. CAPUTO, ESQ., ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
KAMAN BERLOVE LLP, ROCHESTER (GARY MULDOON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS KRISTINE WORTHINGTON AND DONALD WORTHINGTON.
THOMAS L. PELYCH, HORNELL, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT ANDREW WORTHINGTON.
MICHAEL J. CAPUTO, ROCHESTER, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, APPELLANT PRO SE.
ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (LYLE T. HAJDU OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
Appeals from an order of the Family Court, Allegany County (Terrence M. Parker, J.), entered May 16, 2022, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded petitioner custody of the subject child.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals are unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Tuttle v Worthington ([appeal
No. 2] — AD3d — [Aug. 11, 2023] [4th Dept 2023]).
Entered: August 11, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.