Fornino v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
Annotate this CaseDecided on July 28, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, BANNISTER, MONTOUR, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.
315 CA 22-00897
[*1]MICHAEL FORNINO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, W.B. PAYNE COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
SAUNDERS KAHLER, L.L.P., UTICA (MICHAEL D. CALLAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
SARETSKY KATZ & DRANOFF, L.L.P., ELMSFORD (ALLEN L. SHERIDAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.
SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (ALAN J. BEDENKO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT W.B. PAYNE COMPANY, INC.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (David A. Murad, J.), entered May 3, 2022. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the amended complaint against defendant New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company and defendant W.B. Payne Company, Inc.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Fornino v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. ([appeal No. 2] — AD3d — [July 28, 2023] [4th Dept 2023]).
Entered: July 28, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.