Vitkus v Creekwalk Hous., LLC
Annotate this CaseDecided on July 28, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, BANNISTER, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ.
112 CA 22-00909
[*1]DIANNE VITKUS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
CREEKWALK HOUSING, LLC AND SUTTON REAL ESTATE COMPANY, LLC, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
RUPP PFALZGRAF LLC, BUFFALO (MATTHEW A. LENHARD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CREEKWALK HOUSING, LLC.
LAW OFFICE OF JOHN WALLACE, BUFFALO (JOHN WALLACE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT SUTTON REAL ESTATE COMPANY, LLC.
LYNN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (WALTER F. BENSON OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Gregory R. Gilbert, J.), entered June 6, 2022. The order denied the motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on April 11, 2023, and filed in the Onondaga County Clerk's Office on April 12, 2023,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals are unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: July 28, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.