Richards v Hedman Resources Ltd.
Annotate this Case
Richards v Hedman Resources Ltd.
2022 NY Slip Op 05486
Decided on September 30, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on September 30, 2022
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ. (Filed Sept. 30, 2022.)
MOTION NO. (147/22) CA 21-01188.
[*1]IRENE RICHARDS, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LOREN J.RICHARDS, DECEASED, AND INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SURVIVING SPOUSE OF LOREN J. RICHARDS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
HEDMAN RESOURCES LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (ACTION NO. 1.) DAVID D. LAURES AND MADELYN J. LAURES, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND HEDMAN RESOURCES LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (ACTION NO. 2.) ROGER J. ADAMEK, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ANN M. ADAMEK, DECEASED, AND INDIVIDUALLY AS THE SURVIVING SPOUSE OF ANN M. ADAMEK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, HEDMAN RESOURCES LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (ACTION NO. 3.)
Decided on September 30, 2022
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ. (Filed Sept. 30, 2022.)
MOTION NO. (147/22) CA 21-01188.
[*1]IRENE RICHARDS, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LOREN J.RICHARDS, DECEASED, AND INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SURVIVING SPOUSE OF LOREN J. RICHARDS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
HEDMAN RESOURCES LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (ACTION NO. 1.) DAVID D. LAURES AND MADELYN J. LAURES, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND HEDMAN RESOURCES LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (ACTION NO. 2.) ROGER J. ADAMEK, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ANN M. ADAMEK, DECEASED, AND INDIVIDUALLY AS THE SURVIVING SPOUSE OF ANN M. ADAMEK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, HEDMAN RESOURCES LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (ACTION NO. 3.)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
