Farruggio v 918 James Receiver, LLC

Annotate this Case
Farruggio v 918 James Receiver, LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 05472 Decided on September 30, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 30, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, AND NEMOYER, JJ.
995/19 CA 18-01595

[*1]MICHAEL FARRUGGIO, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF THERESA FARRUGGIO, DECEASED, AND SUSAN KARPEN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v

918 JAMES RECEIVER, LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND RIVER MEADOWS, LLC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



GOLDBERG SEGALLA, LLP, SYRACUSE (LISA M. ROBINSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FINKELSTEIN, BLANKINSHIP, FREI-PEARSON & GARBER, LLP, WHITE PLAINS (JEREMIAH FREI-PEARSON OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Anthony J. Paris, J.), entered August 21, 2018. The order, among other things, granted in part plaintiffs' motion for class action certification and denied the cross motion of defendant River Meadows, LLC for severance.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on August 10, 2022,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: September 30, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.