Merizzi v Pipher
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 23, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.
963 CA 22-00621
[*1]DANA M. MERIZZI AND MAUREEN A. RIESTER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v
RUTH PIPHER AND DENISE CORNWELL, AS TRUSTEE OF THE RUTH PIPHER FAMILY TRUST, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
LYNN D'ELIA TEMES & STANCZYK, SYRACUSE (DAVID C. TEMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
MICHAELS & SMOLAK, P.C., AUBURN (MICHAEL G. BERSANI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Thomas G. Leone, A.J.), entered December 9, 2020. The order and judgment granted in part the motion of plaintiffs for a default judgment.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on July 14, 2022,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: December 23, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.