Matter of Florentino v Bukowski
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 18, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
879 CAF 21-01687
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF GENE FLORENTINO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v
JENNIFER BUKOWSKI, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
IN THE MATTER OF BECKY FLORENTINO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v
JENNIFER BUKOWSKI, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
MARGARET A. MURPHY, P.C., HAMBURG (MARGARET A. MURPHY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
THE LAW OFFICE OF RACHEL K. MARRERO, ESQ., BUFFALO (RACHEL K. MARRERO OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS.
DAVID C. SCHOPP, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (RUSSELL E. FOX OF COUNSEL), ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, J.), entered April 8, 2021 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order terminated respondent's visitation with the subject child.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Bukowski v Florentino ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Nov. 18, 2022] [4th Dept 2022]).
Entered: November 18, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.