Matter of DeJesus v Blossick
Annotate this CaseDecided on September 30, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
653 CAF 21-01100
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF WILSON L. DEJESUS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v
ANNE BLOSSICK, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
JILL L. PAPERNO, ACTING PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (CLEA WEISS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
GARY MULDOON, ROCHESTER, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Dandrea L. Ruhlmann, J.), entered July 1, 2021 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, directed that the subject child reside primarily with petitioner during the school year.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.
Entered: September 30, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.