Allen v Grimm

Allen v Grimm 2022 NY Slip Op 05399 Decided on September 30, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 30, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND NEMOYER, JJ.
603 CA 21-01395

[*1]CAROL M. ALLEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

DAVID C. GRIMM, M.D., SHARON L. MANSFIELD, FNP-C, CANANDAIGUA ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES, P.C., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

HIRSCH & TUBIOLO, P.C., ROCHESTER (TAYLOR MARIE HOLMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

ZIFF LAW FIRM, LLP, ELMIRA (CHRISTINA BRUNER SONSIRE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Patrick F. McAllister, A.J.), entered September 7, 2021. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied in part the motion of defendants David C. Grimm, M.D., Sharon L. Mansfield, FNP-C, and Canandaigua Orthopaedic Associates, P.C., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Allen v Grimm ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Sept. 30, 2022] [4th Dept 2022]).

Entered: September 30, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court