People v Young

Annotate this Case
People v Young 2022 NY Slip Op 05387 Decided on September 30, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 30, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND NEMOYER, JJ.
587 KA 20-01458

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

BRENDON A. YOUNG, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



JILL L. PAPERNO, ACTING PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (SHIRLEY A. GORMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (SCOTT MYLES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Alex R. Renzi, J.), rendered November 1, 2017. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of criminal sexual act in the first degree (two counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of two counts of criminal sexual act in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50 [4]). We agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Hughes, 199 AD3d 1332, 1333 [4th Dept 2021]; see generally People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: September 30, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.