Vanloan v Roe

Annotate this Case
Vanloan v Roe 2022 NY Slip Op 04474 Decided on July 8, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 8, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
423 CA 21-01447

[*1]SHIRLEY VANLOAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

CARRIESUE ROSIE ROE, DAVID PAUL JACKSON, VW CREDIT LEASING, LTD., DEFENDANTS, AND COLLEEN ANN BOHEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL R. ARCHILLA, BUFFALO (EMILY M. COBB OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND DEFENDANT VW CREDIT LEASING, LTD.

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (WILLIAM P. MOORE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

LAW OFFICES OF ROTHENBERG & BURNS, GARDEN CITY (MITCHELL E. PAK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS CARRIESUE ROSIE ROE AND DAVID PAUL JACKSON.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered October 1, 2021. The order denied the motion of defendants Colleen Ann Bohen and VW Credit Leasing, Ltd., insofar as it sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against defendant Colleen Ann Bohen.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on March 1, 2022,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: July 8, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.