Ortiz v State of New York
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 18, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
1174 CA 20-01504
[*1]JOSUE ORTIZ, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,
v
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (CLAIM NO. 126292.) (APPEAL NO. 1.)
MAGAVERN MAGAVERN GRIMM LLP, BUFFALO (EDWARD J. MARKARIAN OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANT-APPELLANT.
LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (DUSTIN J. BROCKNER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Michael E. Hudson, J.), entered May 18, 2020. The order denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Ortiz v State of New York ([appeal No. 3] — AD3d — [Mar. 18, 2022] [4th Dept 2022]).
Entered: March 18, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.