Matter of Seiler v Crandall
Annotate this Case
Matter of Seiler v Crandall
2021 NY Slip Op 00782
Decided on February 5, 2021
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on February 5, 2021
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ. (Filed Feb. 5, 2021.)
MOTION NO. (620/20) OP 19-02250.
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF BRIAN SEILER, PETITIONER, HON.
v
JOHN H. CRANDALL, AS ACTING HERKIMER COUNTY COURT JUDGE, LETITIA JAMES, NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFFREY S. CARPENTER, AS HERKIMER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND SCHUYLER TOWN COURT, RESPONDENTS.
Decided on February 5, 2021
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ. (Filed Feb. 5, 2021.)
MOTION NO. (620/20) OP 19-02250.
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF BRIAN SEILER, PETITIONER, HON.
v
JOHN H. CRANDALL, AS ACTING HERKIMER COUNTY COURT JUDGE, LETITIA JAMES, NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFFREY S. CARPENTER, AS HERKIMER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND SCHUYLER TOWN COURT, RESPONDENTS.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motion for reargument denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
