Andruszko v Harrington

Annotate this Case
Andruszko v Harrington 2021 NY Slip Op 06288 Decided on November 12, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 12, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
974 CA 21-00087

[*1]ANDREW L. ANDRUSZKO, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LYNN M. ANDRUSZKO, PLAINTIFF,

v

MICHAEL P. HARRINGTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



MICHAEL P. HARRINGTON, WILLIAM E. WAYMAN AND WILLIAM E. WAYMAN, DOING BUSINESS AS WAYMANS TRUCKING, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v

PETER KAY AUTO SALES, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



CHELUS, HERDZIK, SPEYER & MONTE, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. CHMIEL OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

HAGELIN SPENCER LLC, BUFFALO (SEAN M. SPENCER OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Dennis Ward, J.), entered January 12, 2021. The order denied the motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on October 6, 2021,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: November 12, 2021

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.