Matter of Schunk v Town of York

Annotate this Case
Matter of Schunk v Town of York 2021 NY Slip Op 07398 Decided on December 23, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 23, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
935 CA 20-00729

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN L. SCHUNK AND JAMIE SCHUNK, CLAIMANTS-APPELLANTS,

v

TOWN OF YORK AND COUNTY OF LIVINGSTON, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)



PAUL WILLIAM BELTZ, P.C., BUFFALO (ANNE B. RIMMLER OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANTS-APPELLANTS.

LIPPMAN O'CONNOR, BUFFALO (MATTHEW J. DUGGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT TOWN OF YORK.

WEBSTER SZANYI LLP, BUFFALO (PETER L. VEECH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT COUNTY OF LIVINGSTON.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Livingston County (Thomas E. Moran, J.), entered June 5, 2020. The order denied the motion of claimants for leave to reargue and renew their application for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Schunk v Town of York ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Dec. 23, 2021] [4th Dept 2021]).

Entered: December 23, 2021

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.