Preaster v Biringanine
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 12, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
897 CA 20-01663
[*1]MICHAEL PREASTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
JOSEPHINE BIRINGANINE AND RUNYEMURA MUGINGI, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
THE RUSSELL FRIEDMAN LAW GROUP, LLP, ROCHESTER (RON F. WRIGHT OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
LAW OFFICE OF KEITH D. MILLER, LIVERPOOL (KEITH D. MILLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Gerard J. Neri, J.), entered October 7, 2020. The order denied plaintiff's motion insofar as it sought leave to renew plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, granted plaintiff's motion insofar as it sought leave to reargue and, upon reargument, adhered to the prior order granting defendants' motion and dismissing the complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: November 12, 2021
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.